<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Socratic Method, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andersonpost.org/2009/07/26/the-socratic-method-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andersonpost.org/2009/07/26/the-socratic-method-part-2/</link>
	<description>think&#124;ink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew_D</title>
		<link>http://andersonpost.org/2009/07/26/the-socratic-method-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andersonpost.org/?p=749#comment-1762</guid>
		<description>&quot;the question as question&quot; has the ring of some of those Frenchies you and I read... 
 
Jesus seems to me to be an expert questioner.  But is he to be imitated in this? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;the question as question&quot; has the ring of some of those Frenchies you and I read&#8230; </p>
<p>Jesus seems to me to be an expert questioner.  But is he to be imitated in this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papermind</title>
		<link>http://andersonpost.org/2009/07/26/the-socratic-method-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>papermind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andersonpost.org/?p=749#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>Come on, 
that bit about &#039;subverting the question as question&#039; was pretty cool. And the idea that the types of questions we ask can give an insight into the beings we think we are - that was interesting. 
There is a lot of guff though... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on,<br />
that bit about &#039;subverting the question as question&#039; was pretty cool. And the idea that the types of questions we ask can give an insight into the beings we think we are &#8211; that was interesting.<br />
There is a lot of guff though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papermind</title>
		<link>http://andersonpost.org/2009/07/26/the-socratic-method-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>papermind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andersonpost.org/?p=749#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>Dan, sometimes you really waffle on. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, sometimes you really waffle on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
