<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things You should know about Knowing. Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andersonpost.org/2009/05/04/things-you-should-know-about-knowing-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andersonpost.org/2009/05/04/things-you-should-know-about-knowing-part-2/</link>
	<description>think&#124;ink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRShellard</title>
		<link>http://andersonpost.org/2009/05/04/things-you-should-know-about-knowing-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>JRShellard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andersonpost.org/?p=658#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the old chestnut of the &#039;two cultures&#039; between the sciences and the humanities.  I was reading this just yesterday which was kind of related - &lt;a href=&quot;http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38894&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38894&lt;/a&gt; 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the old chestnut of the &#039;two cultures&#039; between the sciences and the humanities.  I was reading this just yesterday which was kind of related &#8211; <a href="http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38894" rel="nofollow">http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38894</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papermind</title>
		<link>http://andersonpost.org/2009/05/04/things-you-should-know-about-knowing-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>papermind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andersonpost.org/?p=658#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>hmmm, on reflection I probably overthought this post. Emma found it too technical as well. You should see all the rubbish I cut out of it.Still I came up with a possible book title: &quot;Epishtemogoly: how to win arguments at the Pub...&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, on reflection I probably overthought this post. Emma found it too technical as well. You should see all the rubbish I cut out of it.Still I came up with a possible book title: &#8220;Epishtemogoly: how to win arguments at the Pub&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: horatioalderaan</title>
		<link>http://andersonpost.org/2009/05/04/things-you-should-know-about-knowing-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1839</link>
		<dc:creator>horatioalderaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andersonpost.org/?p=658#comment-1839</guid>
		<description>Whoa, new comment system! 
 
The somewhat scientific mode of discourse was a little harder for a small brain like mine to wade through than the discussion of the solipsist. But still very enjoyable. I came across some &#039;warm&#039; discussion while at the Engineering dept. precisely because epistemological differences between the scientists and those calling themselves Critical Realists. Ironically, much of the heat was due to the fact that the scientists&#039; seemed unable to comprehend that they even had an epistemology. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, new comment system! </p>
<p>The somewhat scientific mode of discourse was a little harder for a small brain like mine to wade through than the discussion of the solipsist. But still very enjoyable. I came across some &#039;warm&#039; discussion while at the Engineering dept. precisely because epistemological differences between the scientists and those calling themselves Critical Realists. Ironically, much of the heat was due to the fact that the scientists&#039; seemed unable to comprehend that they even had an epistemology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
